Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <406461A9.DC523B31@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:00:25 -0800 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: Strange problem wiith Cygwin ssh-still no luck :-( References: <20040326163426 DOT 53203 DOT qmail AT web13001 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Bindaas Guy wrote: > > So, what you are saying is that RSA authentication > DOES NOT authenticate a user to a Windows user and > password log in authenticates the user to a defined > windows user? If that is the case,is there no way i > can 'map' to a windows user? 'id' shows the proper > info about the user indicating that he is part of > Administrators group even while logged in with RSA > keys....Isn't that a bug? This is explained in the "NT Security" section of the user's guide. Passwordless authentication works fine to fully authenticate and switch user contexts on the local machine. However, network devices (SMB dirs/printers) require the password to authenticate and so you will not be able to access them if you've logged in with a passwordless method. (Assuming that they require auth, that is.) Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/