Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040325194138.028547a0@pop.rcn.com>
X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT rcn DOT com (Unverified)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:45:39 -0500
To: Thomas L Roche <tlroche AT us DOT ibm DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin under Wine?
In-Reply-To: <OF5AB740AB.55B11539-ON85256E63.0002D206-85256E63.000319EA@ us.ibm.com>
References: <OF5AB740AB DOT 55B11539-ON85256E63 DOT 0002D206-85256E63 DOT 000319EA AT us DOT ibm DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i2Q0meo4017497

At 07:33 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
>Can Cygwin currently run under Wine? Why I ask:
>
>While sounding out Cygwin users in my organization, I got the comment:
>
>> If Cygwin would run under Wine, I'd be a very happy person, we
>> wouldn't need real Windows machines for builds, and we could consign
>> all our Windows build machines, their ITSC compliance, and the
>> continual stream of updates and security fixes to the deepest pits
>> of hell.
>
>Which seems a worthy goal :-) But can it be done? Are there
>alternative means to the same end (i.e. running cygwin under some
>emulator, presumably on a *nix on intel)?
>
>Apologies if this is a FAQ: I didn't see anything about this in the
>FAQ (BTW: didn't there useta be a "one big FAQ" option, a lá the
>"one big UG"?) or the UG, and a quick Google finds a lot of
>not-too-recent posts detailing difficulties and partial successes.
>
>If possible please reply to me directly, as well as to the group.


There's been talk about it in the past but it's unclear how well it 
would work.  You'd have to try it.  I'm not sure I see the logic in 
the comment from which the question stems.  If the goal is to avoid 
using Windows platforms for builds, why isn't a cross-compiler 
targeting Windows enough?  Of course, if the answer is "it is", then
we're off-topic. ;-)


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/