Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:02:33 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction() Message-ID: <20040325160233.GB7651@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040325150802 DOT GA4123 AT redhat DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040325104702 DOT 03b5a8a0 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040325104702.03b5a8a0@127.0.0.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:48:03AM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >At 10:08 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +0000, Ghanshyam wrote: >>>Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in >>>both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 >> >>Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that possibly > > ^^^^^^^ > should read 1.5.9 (soon to be followed > by 1.5.10 ;-) ) Oops. Right. Injudicious editing. I had more words in there about the planned 1.5.10 release and cut them, leaving in the TBA version. Thanks for the clarification. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/