Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040325104702.03b5a8a0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:48:03 -0500 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction() Cc: gshyam AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com, harsh_arora AT mentorg DOT com In-Reply-To: <20040325150802.GA4123@redhat.com> References: <20040325150802 DOT GA4123 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 10:08 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote: >On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +0000, Ghanshyam wrote: >>Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in >>both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 > >Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that possibly ^^^^^^^ should read 1.5.9 (soon to be followed by 1.5.10 ;-) ) >suggest something to you? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/