Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:39:48 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20040325150802.GA4123@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEG83alUohIi6YEF00000236@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2004 15:39:48.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[67D18F30:01C4127F]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 25 March 2004 15:08

> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +0000, Ghanshyam wrote:
> >Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result 
> (two SIGCHLD) 
> >in both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1
> 
> Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that 
> possibly suggest something to you?


  When I saw his post, it suggested to me that I should fall out of my chair
laughing!  :P


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/