Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:24:34 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ghanshyam <gshyam AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
cc: harsh_arora AT mentorg DOT com
Subject: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10403242018160.3101-100000@denver.india.mentorg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi all,

I found some problem in sigaction() system call with respect to following
assertions defined in IEEE std 2003.1 -1992 Test methods for measuring
conformance to POSIX-part1 document: When I run NIST-PCTS test suite on
cygwin the following assertion failed.

14(C) 	If the behavior associated with {_POSIX_JOB_CONTROL} is supported:
	When sig is SIGCHLD and the SA_NOCLDSTOP flag is set in sa_flags, then a
	call to sigaction(sig, act, oact) results in a SIGCHLD signal not
	being generated for the parent process whenever any of its child
	processes stop.

********** SIGCHLD signal received by parent process when SIGSTOP signal
is send to child process!


with thanks and regards,

ghanshyam



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/