Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <40609FD8.5030103@ianbrandt.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:36:40 -0500 From: Ian Brandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Definitely no sshd on FAT32? References: <40608855 DOT 8080605 AT ianbrandt DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > It is, but it won't be as secure. See below. > > FYI, "ntsec" is only ignored for the *disk* volumes, but it is used for a > bunch of other NT-enabled features that have nothing to do with disks > (e.g., user context switching). However, "ntsec" is on by default now, so > you aren't losing this functionality by omitting it. Good to know. > Try turning off "StrictModes" in your sshd_config. Looks like it's already set to no in the installed config. From man sshd_config it looks like StrictModes applies to checks of the home directory and files for the user logging in. I had tried installing the service with '-t' option to sshd, but apparently it still does the perm checks on the host keys even in test mode. Regards, Ian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/