Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Blair P. Houghton" <blair AT houghton DOT net>
Subject: Re: unlink(2) or fopen(3) failing under cygwin
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:05:45 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <loom.20040323T180213-729@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom DOT 20040323T173940-810 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 12.2.142.7 (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1))

Blair P. Houghton <blair <at> houghton.net> writes:
> 
>     while(!unlink(...))

YAASA.  STFU!

Figures, the moment I post that to the world I realize
that the ! looks hinky.  Swot I get for not reading the
man-page for unlink(2) in about 20 years, and blindly
copying idioms I find in the common.h file of trn...

I'm not on the machine with the problem right now, but
I'll try reversing the polarity of the neutron flow
this evening and get back on whether it worked.

--Blair
  "Camus:  L'esprit du l'escalier!
   Homer Simpson:  D'oh!"


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/