Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.73.164 Message-ID: <40606A7E.1010409@kegel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:49:02 -0800 From: Dan Kegel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Minimal test case for Make crash bug References: <405C00BF DOT 3090507 AT kegel DOT com> <405C06C4 DOT 7030508 AT kegel DOT com> <405C6C4B DOT 90409 AT kegel DOT com> <405C939E DOT 5020909 AT kegel DOT com> <405D1ACD DOT 4060809 AT kegel DOT com> <405D3CEA DOT 3090006 AT kegel DOT com> <405DE73D DOT 4070100 AT kegel DOT com> <405E0B96 DOT 1010407 AT kegel DOT com> <405E8EF8 DOT 2070706 AT kegel DOT com> In-Reply-To: <405E8EF8.2070706@kegel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dan Kegel wrote: >>> (gdb) p alloc_sz >>> $3 = 0 >> >> Bingo. That's the problem. I've checked in a fix for this and have >> uploaded a new snapshot. Can you confirm that it fixes the problem? > > Yep, fixes my little test case. > I'll run more exhaustive tests tomorrow. It handled my real-world case well, but when I increased the stress level, I ran into a problem (the following is on my wife's beefy winXP machine, same one as before): Running two toolchain builds in parallel, both in the background, and with tail -f in the foreground, I pressed ^C to kill the tail -f, and one of the toolchain builds aborted with the message: C:\cygwin\opt\crosstool\powerpc-860-linux-gnu\gcc-3.3.3-glibc-2.3.2\lib\gcc-lib\ powerpc-860-linux-gnu\3.3.3\collect2.exe (684): *** fork: can't reserve memory for stack 0x30000 - 0x230000, Win32 error 487 5 [main] collect2 2932 sync_with_child: child 684(0x6EC) died before initialization with status code 0x1 Sounds rather like some stress testing is in order, but I don't know if it should hold up your next release. One further observation: on winMe, you can only open a dozen or so /dev/null fds in a single process before open starts returning -1. Shouldn't matter, but it is strange. - Dan -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/