Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Analyze: Velop Mail Shield v0.0.3 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:46:38 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <1 AT pervalidus DOT net> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.9-1 In-Reply-To: <20040320215557.GA10292@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20040319175342 DOT 69F3E400188 AT redhat DOT com> <20040320215557 DOT GA10292 AT redhat DOT com> X-Archive: encrypt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:05:23PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > >On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >$ cygcheck.exe -f /usr/lib/libiberty.a > >binutils-20040312-1 > >cygwin-1.5.9-1 > > > >Since you maintain both, what's the consensus ? > > That you have too much time on your hands? Sorry, but I don't get it (sarcasm ?). Anyway, I have time to report it. Maybe you'll have to "fix" it once you figure which should be part of Cygwin. -- How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/