Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <F76C9B2DA2FC4C4CA0A18E288BBCBCF70361F33F@nihexchange24.nih.gov>
From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)" <BBuchbinder AT niaid DOT nih DOT gov>
To: "'Cygwin List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Should setup.ini say prev to cygwin 1.5.8 is 1.5.5
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:32:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes

The problem with going back to 1.5.5 is that one starts getting "The
procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link
library cygwin1.dll" error message.  I'd hate to have roll everything back
to the way it was before 1.5.6-1.

I've played with trying to get setup to roll back to 1.5.7-1 by editing
setup.ini, so far without success.  Any hints would be appreciated.
(Explicit instructions would be GREATLY appreciated.)  I'd hate to go into
"unsupported land" by just untaring it outside of setup?

And just for my education, why was 1.5.7-1 thought to be so inferior to
1.5.5-1 that it was skipped for prev?  I'm sure that the answer is in the
cygwin-developers mailing list, but, as a "civilian", I have no access to
its archives.

- Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of
Larry Hall
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:58 AM
To: Brian Keener; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Should setup.ini say prev to cygwin 1.5.8 is 1.5.5


At 06:39 PM 3/17/2004, you wrote:
>Richard Campbell wrote:
>> >>d:\cygwin\bin\gdb.exe (1616): *** m.AllocationBase 0x0, m.BaseAddress
0x616E0000
>> >>, m.RegionSize 0x1AA0000, m.State 0x10000
>> >
>> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01080.html
>> 
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01382.html
>>
>Thanks both of you for the pointer.  I had not as yet dug into the error
but had 
>thought that by mentioning I might get a point but I also see that in so
doing I 
>clouded the issue - the true message was the subject:
>
>Should the previous version of cygwin 1.5.8 be 1.5.5 or 1.5.7  as far as
setup.ini 
>is concerned because setup says it is 1.5.5-1.
>
>Thanks again for the pointer.
>
>


1.5.5-1 is the proper previous version, just as it was for 1.5.7.



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/