Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: From: Ben DOT Taylor AT provident DOT co DOT uk Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: using gcc 3.3.3 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:49:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Thanks. I seemingly compiled gcc 3.4 20040310 successfully, once I had installed bison and flex into cygwin. I'm going to try the decisive test tonight which will be to rename all the g++ files other than the one in gcc_34 directory, compile a C++ program, then rename the cygwin1.dll to cygwin2.dll, then try to run the program. If it runs, I've got gcc 3.4 working correctly. This way, I know that the gcc 3.4 is definitely the only one being used, and that it's not relying on cygwin for the program to run (although it is to run the compiler). Now... is it possible to use -mno-cygwin on the compiler *itself*..., maybe? **************************************************************************************** DISCLAIMER. The contents of this email and its attachments are intended solely for the original recipients and express the views of the authors and not necessarily the Company. If you are not the intended recipient please delete without copying or forwarding and inform the sender that you received it in error. Thank you. **************************************************************************************** -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/