Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Rolf Campbell <Endlisnis AT mailc DOT net>
Subject: Re: latest snapshot seems better wrt make -j hang problems
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:38 -0500
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <c34on3$h5a$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <20040313171440 DOT GA7326 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ottgw.tropicnetworks.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
In-Reply-To: <20040313171440.GA7326@redhat.com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
> with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
> 
> I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
> system set up but could anyone confirm or deny whether that this
> snapshot behaves better?
> 
> If it does still die then an strace of the failing case would be
> helpful.  If it is too large for the mailing list software then let me
> know and I'll arrange to get the strace via some other mechanism --
> i.e., via a brand new cygwin bugzilla setup.
> 
> cgf

I've been running it for about 24 hours on my HyperThreaded XP machine, 
14000 iteration, not a single problem.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/