Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:31:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Email Mangling
In-Reply-To: <20040305151120.GC4036@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.56.0403051130030.1570@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0403050248110 DOT 596 AT lap> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0403050811040 DOT 11159 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040305151120 DOT GC4036 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:12:29AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Gregory Borota wrote:
> >>Looking at the headers for a message I sent recently (id 89248) I see
> >>that my email address was not mutilated in the Received: field.  If one
> >>uses SBC Yahoo's smtp server he has his email address as username.
> >>
> >>If this is a very isolated incident then maybe nobody should bother.
> >>If not maybe it should.  I personally no longer care, I changed the
> >>smtp server, just wanted to point this out (don't know if this subject
> >>already discussed, too many hits for sbc yahoo if googling the
> >>archive).
> >
> >Since the raw text is generated by a CGI script, steps could be taken
> >to block spam harvesters from even seeing it...  OTOH, it might be
> >easier to just run the substitution on the Received: header...
>
> Since 89248 is not a URL, I am not sure what we're talking about here.
> I looked at a couple of messages and don't see anything other than
> cygwin AT cygwin DOT com in the received lines, which sort of makes sense.
>
> cgf

Sorry, my bad.  I should have included the archives link.  He meant
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-03/msg00245.html>.  89248 is a message
number.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/