Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:30:16 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.5.5.1 st_ctime and st_mtime is not updated for functions.
Message-ID: <20040305103016.GE21805@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10403051553410 DOT 21653-100000 AT denver DOT india DOT mentorg DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10403051553410.21653-100000@denver.india.mentorg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Mar  5 15:55, Vinay Kumar wrote:
> Hi all,        
>    I ran PCTS on cygwin 1.5.5.1 and found some problem. According to
> standard document of posix conformance  following function need to update
> the st_ctime and st_mtime fields of the underlying file. These functions
> are not doing so. Is there any specific reason for that? Is it
> implementation limitation or a design contraint?

Windows is handling the timestamps differently.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/