Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040302184354.03d0a598@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:52:10 -0500 To: Erick Castillo , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: gcc 2.95_ In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 05:58 PM 3/2/2004, you wrote: >Rolf Campbell mailc.net> writes: > >> >> gcc version 3.3 works fine, gcc v2.95 was broken on cygwin and nobody >> wanted to fix it, so it was discontinued. >> >> Erick Castillo wrote: >> > Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3... >does >> > not work properly. Where could i find 2.95 if not through the simple cygwin >> > install wizard? Will version 2.95 even work on the latest cygwin release? >Any >> > information on this would be incredibly useful. thanks. >> > >> > --Erick Castillo >> >> >> > > >You're absolutely right, gcc version 3.3 does work fine. The problem I'm having >is specific to the software I am trying to compile. The application i have >compiles with older versions of the compiler and this is why I'm looking for >older ones. So one last question... did v2.96 meet the same fate as v2.95? > >By the way, thanks a million for the response. You saved me several hours. 2.95 was the last official Cygwin release before the 3.x.x series. So there was no Cygwin gcc 2.96. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/