Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:20:56 -0600 From: Chuck Irvine Subject: RE: Control-c not working in rxvt (for exiting jboss server) In-reply-to: <6.0.1.1.0.20040228153324.039d6410@127.0.0.1> To: "'Cygwin List'" Message-id: <001c01c3fe40$c1035910$6500a8c0@Ray> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-IsSubscribed: yes Larry, I see that I've caused you some concern. Let me be more specific. Not being familiar with Cygwin "snapshots", I was tending to equate the term with what might go by the name "daily builds" in other projects. Folks are often warned that these are less stable then the "current stable release" and that care should be exercised. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Hall > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 2:39 PM > To: Chuck Irvine > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: Control-c not working in rxvt (for exiting jboss server) > > > At 02:08 PM 2/28/2004, Chuck Irvine you wrote: > >I'm a little hesitant to go to the latest snapshot since I rely on > >cygwin for many things. Do you think it is as safe as the current > >version? > > > What does that mean? What makes the "current version" > "safe"? You are implying something here by your vagueness. > The implications, more than likely, aren't synonymous with > your intent. But you need to be more > clear with your question if you expect to get any kind of > meaningful answer. > > > -- > Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com > RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office > 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX > Holliston, MA 01746 > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/