Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040225145609.03b9f2b0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:04:55 -0500
To: Michael Brand <cygwin AT brand DOT scso DOT com>, Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.5.7: Problem with tcsh 6.12.00-7 / sed 4.0.8-1
In-Reply-To: <1077733696.403ce940214be@scso.com>
References: <1077733696 DOT 403ce940214be AT scso DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 01:28 PM 2/25/2004, Michael Brand you wrote:
>Here's something that may help.
>
>I copied an ancient distribution of Cygwin (simple copy, no installation at 
>all) from another computer, and it seems to work fine on the dual-Xeon.
>
>I am attaching the cygcheck output on the original computer.
>
>I am a bit skeptical that this will help, because the working version is 
>downright archeological, but I'm hoping.


No, you were right to be skeptical.  Cygwin 1.3.22 is old enough that 
hearing that you don't see the problem there isn't too helpful in terms
of fixing the problem for the current version. 



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/