Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:13:04 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PROBLEM - Signals not handled while waiting on semphores Message-ID: <20040223151304.GB7932@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4039EF3F DOT 9070202 AT emblazesemi DOT com> <20040223124501 DOT GX1587 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <403A12B6 DOT 8030008 AT emblazesemi DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <403A12B6.8030008@emblazesemi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 04:48:22PM +0200, Gabi Davar wrote: >Thanks for the quick reply, classic SysV semaphores do behave correctly >with new dll. > >unfortunately there are still problems - >* flag SA_RESTART passed to sigaction seem to be ignored ( see previous >post for sample code ) I believe that POSIX allows this. Currently SA_RESTART is only handled for read and readv. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/