Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Totte Karlsson" <totte AT codeschack DOT com>
Subject: Re: vi and cygwin
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:17:58 -0800
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <c1900c$ua7$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <F67AB1DD14544242BE5BFE94F5939175B7F296 AT E2KMEMMCS1 DOT ftbco DOT ftn DOT com> <c162uh$f3h$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <qn16hsj6zk05 DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de> <c16c1h$de$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <1cl6bsb1q1y8w DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de>
Reply-To: "Totte Karlsson" <totte AT codeschack DOT com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-111-237-86.sd.sd.cox.net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106

OK, you are correct, vim is vi! ...it's just spelled different I guess..
....

"Thorsten Kampe" <thorsten AT thorstenkampe DOT de> wrote in message
news:1cl6bsb1q1y8w DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de...
> * Totte Karlsson (2004-02-21 02:25 +0100)
> > does not mean that vim is vi! Read my question!
>
> Read my answer: vim behaves like vi, it is called with "vi" in the
> shell and therefor it /is/ vi
(http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/call-it-a-duck.html).
>
> The original vi is not free software so you will hardly find it on any
> Linux machine (same with ksh for example).
>
> Thorsten
>
>




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/