Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Totte Karlsson" Subject: Re: vi and cygwin Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:17:58 -0800 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <1cl6bsb1q1y8w DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de> Reply-To: "Totte Karlsson" X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-111-237-86.sd.sd.cox.net X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 OK, you are correct, vim is vi! ...it's just spelled different I guess.. .... "Thorsten Kampe" wrote in message news:1cl6bsb1q1y8w DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de... > * Totte Karlsson (2004-02-21 02:25 +0100) > > does not mean that vim is vi! Read my question! > > Read my answer: vim behaves like vi, it is called with "vi" in the > shell and therefor it /is/ vi (http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/call-it-a-duck.html). > > The original vi is not free software so you will hardly find it on any > Linux machine (same with ksh for example). > > Thorsten > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/