Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <4036E874.9030708@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:11:16 -0500 From: Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040120 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: zip with encryption References: <200402202134 DOT i1KLYBcC022320 AT kafka DOT net DOT nih DOT gov> In-Reply-To: <200402202134.i1KLYBcC022320@kafka.net.nih.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit bbuchbinder wrote: > I was wondering if it might be possible to have zip 2.3 re-compiled > with encryption and re-released. Chuck Wilson stated in > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2001/msg00005.html > and > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2002-05/msg00018.html > that it can be done but that first Red Hat needs to inform the U.S. > government that binaries with encryption will be exported. I know > that there are other ways to get encrypted zip files but it would > be convenient if the official Cygwin zip would be encryption-enabled. Also, I'm not sure what the implications are for our mirroring hosts. Does the law require them to also notify the US govt, simply because they mirror what sourceware's server provides? Surely the kernel mirrors have dealt with this issue; perhaps only the "primary source" needs to make the notification. I don't know. I'm not a lawyer so I don't even WANT to know. But it's Yet Another Thing RH's lawyers would have to look into, just for little old me to include encryption code in cygwin's port of the zip package. Not likely to happen -- especially with Red Hat's current legal issues taking up all the lawyering time. SCO, XFree86 licensing GPL incompatibilities, etc etc etc -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/