Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:37:02 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: when to rebase? Message-ID: <20040221003701.GD2296@tishler.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040220132713 DOT 0391c768 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <20040220203215 DOT GC2296 AT tishler DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-IsSubscribed: yes Peter, On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Unfortunately, rebasing apparently breaks zsh: > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00415.html > > As the zsh maintainer, I'm still waiting for the rebase and gcc > maintainers to make a ruling on just where the problem is. See: > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00573.html FWIW, I just tried the above with Microsoft's rebase and observed the same behavior. Note this is not a "ruling" just another data point. Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/