Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:00:51 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Can't get list of download sites Message-ID: <20040220170051.GE5195@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <476AFB33B6D50B4286FB94A671FC779E039237 AT coxml1 DOT cox DOT co DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <476AFB33B6D50B4286FB94A671FC779E039237@coxml1.cox.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:32:32PM -0000, Hughes, Bill wrote: >>Sent: 20 February 2004 13:42 From: Christopher Faylor >> >>I suppose that theory will be corroborated soon as the complaints flood >>into this mailing list. Or not. >> >>FWIW, WFM. > >I didn't parse this last correctly as standard acronyms and thought cgf >was having an even worse day than usual and had escalated WJM to the >next level... Have a nice weekend, If I am understanding your misinterpretation correctly you can rest assured that I try hard to avoid the use of or implication of profanity in my messages although I'm sure an occasional RT?M has slipped by. However, that said, for the longest time, I habitually read WFM as exactly what I think you think it means. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/