Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <000b01c3f5f6$d832be70$450210ac@tcgp.dundee.ac.uk> Reply-To: From: To: Cc: Subject: setup "base": strange behaviour of libbz2-1 and libpcre Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:11:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UoD-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) X-UoD-Spam-Report: -------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by a SpamAssassin installation on the spam checking server hughnew at the University of Dundee. Content analysis details: (-4.7 hits, 5.0 required) 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-UoD-Scan-Signature: dce7ec473fd88875bc2f788d14e1cba1 Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Sorry, I know this has been asked a while ago but I can't find the Q and I'm pretty certain there wasn't an A. 1. Choose default "base" setup from internet and run to completion. 2. Immediately choose it again and two new packages are identified for installation: libbz2_1-1.0.2-5 and libpcre0-4.5-1. Is there a reason why these two are not selected and installed at run 1? I tried looking at setup.ini but found nothing exceptionable. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/