Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: latex painfully slow References: <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040213210230 DOT 0392c798 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> From: jmadams AT stsci DOT edu (John M. Adams) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:02:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040213210230.0392c798@127.0.0.1> (Larry Hall's message of "Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:03:25 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, cygwin32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at donner.stsci.edu) Larry Hall writes: > At 06:25 PM 2/13/2004, John M. Adams you wrote: >>Dear Friends, >> >>Yesterday I updated cygwin and now latex is amazingly slow. By this I >>mean that its output comes out about 1 line per second. You know, >>stuff like this: >> >>I am not observing any other performance problems on the system. So, >>I wonder whether something is wrong with latex. >> >>Comments? > > Sure. How about: > >>Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Fair enough. Not a cygwin problem. It's a kpathsea behavior stemming from having TEXINPUTS including "." and a sudden increase in the files under that tree coinciding with a cygwin update. My apologies. -- John M. Adams -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/