Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040215090034.00b16d10@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: ken04thompson AT pop DOT earthlink DOT net Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:06:14 -0500 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Ken Thompson Subject: Re: Why choice between unix and dos line endings? In-Reply-To: <001e01c3f368$f3bddac0$6500a8c0@Ray> References: <001e01c3f368$f3bddac0$6500a8c0 AT Ray> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes At 09:10 PM 2/14/2004, you wrote: >Something I've never been able to figure out is why Cygwin offers to >install with the choice of either dos or unix line endings. The way I >see it is that using dos line endings allows for good integration with >native windows apps. I can see no advantage of using unix line endings, >though I guess there must be one otherwise the option wouldn't be >offered. Can any one shed some light on this. Thanks > >Chuck > The purpose of the cygwin project is to provide a posix emulation on top of win32 to allow easy porting of unix applications. Unix applications DO NOT use DOS line endings. Integration with native windows applications is at best a secondary goal of the project. I would never select DOS line endings because it would break most of the applications I use cygwin for. >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/