Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:39:00 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 20040214 snapshot is better (was DO NOT USE the 20040213 snapshot) Message-ID: <20040214153859.GA18912@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 12:25:32AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:55:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:45:47PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:58:42PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>>>The above messages might indicate that there is more than one version of >>>>the cygwin DLL on your system. >>> >>>Sometimes it does. In this case, it indicates a problem with the >>>snapshot. I did a fair amount of testing on this version of cygwin but, >>>as sometimes happens, it failed in the field. >> >>Just thought I'd make it clear that the current snapshot is broken. >> >>Apologies for any inconvenience I caused to anyone who downloaded it. > >The 20040214 snapshot passes the test suite, so it is demonstrably better >than the 20040213 snapshot. > >Please try it out. http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/