Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <402CC21C.4070302@x-ray.at> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:25:00 +0100 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MultiZilla/1.5.0.4h MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'Cygwin List'" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: xemacs-21.4.14-2/xemacs-tags-21.4.14-2/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.14-2 References: <0C260F619E428642BFA6380177C3ADF37DBE56 AT exmsea005 DOT us DOT wamu DOT net> In-Reply-To: <0C260F619E428642BFA6380177C3ADF37DBE56@exmsea005.us.wamu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Karr, David schrieb: > Now that Xemacs/Cygwin is installable from "cygwin-setup", what is the > difference between installing it from this, as opposed to using the > "xemacs-setup" that we get from xemacs.org? If I've been updating my > installation over time from "xemacs-setup", what will happen the next > time I update it from "cygwin-setup"? The original version has also native Win32 support (much faster), whilst the cygwin-setup version only cygwin support with dual Win32/X. If you use only xemacs-cygwin then I would consider switching to the cygwin setup, since the xemacs folks didn't upgrade their setup.ini file for a long time now. (though there were no Win32 specific fixes lately) Volker: Ultimatively I would suggest a [test] version from the 21.5 tree also, since this is the real beast. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/