Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: thing1-200.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:39:30 -0600 (CST) From: Brian Ford X-X-Sender: ford AT thing1-200 Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Shankar Unni cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Different executables of the same source In-Reply-To: <402A71FC.8040501@netscape.net> Message-ID: References: <8D861ADC5B8FD211B4100008C71EA7DA04F7140D AT kjsdemucshrexc1 DOT eu DOT pm DOT com> <402A71FC DOT 8040501 AT netscape DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Shankar Unni wrote: > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > How can one get the creation time of object file foo.o? > > > Use "objdump -p". > > But it looks like gcc doesn't stuff a timestamp into the .o, but does > into the .exe. > Just a simple correction. gcc doesn't create .o or .exe files. as/ld do respectively :). So, this would be an as "buglet", I guess. Feel free to follow up in the binutils mailing list if you feel the urge. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International Phone: 314-551-8460 Fax: 314-551-8444 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/