Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:14:16 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Plausibility of sendmail? Message-ID: <20040206151416.GA14486@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:31:02AM -0800, Karl M wrote: >There were some strong opinions expressed on both sides about whether >sendmail is a good thing or not...but the bottom line is that no one >has offered to maintain sendmail as a package under Cygwin. If you >want to do that, I don't think that anyone would stop you. There is >presently a direct replacement available under cygwin. > >Why is this thread living on? Because this is the cygwin mailing list. It is the rule that discussion must go on past the point where there is an obvious solution. The solution here, is, of course, for someone to package sendmail and offer it as a cygwin package following the rules which are documented on the cygwin web site. Hmm. I think it is time for me to send my "You know you're a cygwin user, if..." email. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/