Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Joaquin" <winminion AT realmspace DOT com>
To: <Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Plausibility of sendmail?
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:26:57 -0800
Message-ID: <010101c3ec71$d78086d0$c901a8c0@macross>
In-Reply-To: <OF610EF38B.F958AE40-ON85256E2E.00626F78@empirehealthcare.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On another angle for this discussion.  Consider that for one M$ $FU 3.5
has sendmail.  Before this many commercial solutions charging quite a
lot of $$ for sendmail under Windows.  Microsoft even compiled a version
of sendmail for the earliest versions of Windows NT 3.51 long ago and
posted it on their ftp server.  Other companies made sendmail-look-alike
programs that could be scripted.

There is demand there, but it is not so obvious.


 - Joaquin



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/