Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040205214817.038fa600@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:02:54 -0500
To: "Edward S. Peschko" <esp5 AT pge DOT com>, Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: ldd equivalent
In-Reply-To: <20040206024245.GA26634@mdssdev05.comp.pge.com>
References: <20040206021038 DOT GA26483 AT mdssdev05 DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040205213747 DOT 038e0528 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <20040206024245 DOT GA26634 AT mdssdev05 DOT comp DOT pge DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 09:42 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:38:33PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote:
>> At 09:10 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote:
>> >hey,
>> >
>> >I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to 
>> >ldd.
>> >
>> >If so, why isn't it called ldd?
>> >
>> >If not, what's the equivalent?
>> >
>> >I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in
>> >
>> >http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html
>> >
>> >but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken.
>> 
>> 
>> Try:
>> 
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html
>> 
>> You have a typo in the URL above.
>> 
>
>well, I was there - I'm referring to the link *inside* the message.


Of course.  My apologies.


>It points to some site which no longer exists.


Quite true.


>In any case, why isn't ldd bundled with binutils? 


Sorry, I'm not equipped to answer that.


>Is it just because 
>ldd is implemented on top of objdump?


Certainly not.  Cygwin's binutils has 'objdump'.  



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/