Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: mdssdev05.comp.pge.com: esp5 set sender to esp5 AT pge DOT com using -f Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:42:45 -0800 From: "Edward S. Peschko" To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: ldd equivalent Message-ID: <20040206024245.GA26634@mdssdev05.comp.pge.com> References: <20040206021038 DOT GA26483 AT mdssdev05 DOT comp DOT pge DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040205213747 DOT 038e0528 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040205213747.038e0528@127.0.0.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:38:33PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: > At 09:10 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote: > >hey, > > > >I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to > >ldd. > > > >If so, why isn't it called ldd? > > > >If not, what's the equivalent? > > > >I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in > > > >http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html > > > >but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken. > > > Try: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html > > You have a typo in the URL above. > well, I was there - I'm referring to the link *inside* the message. It points to some site which no longer exists. In any case, why isn't ldd bundled with binutils? Is it just because ldd is implemented on top of objdump? Ed -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/