Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040205213747.038e0528@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:38:33 -0500
To: "Edward S. Peschko" <esp5 AT pge DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: ldd equivalent
In-Reply-To: <20040206021038.GA26483@mdssdev05.comp.pge.com>
References: <20040206021038 DOT GA26483 AT mdssdev05 DOT comp DOT pge DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 09:10 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote:
>hey,
>
>I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to 
>ldd.
>
>If so, why isn't it called ldd?
>
>If not, what's the equivalent?
>
>I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in
>
>http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html
>
>but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken.


Try:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html

You have a typo in the URL above.


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/