Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20040131171232.91059.qmail@web61008.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:12:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Rick Rankin <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: two versions of cygwin 1.5.7 in the wild
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20040131154322.GA27226@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes


--- Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> There was a few hour period during which an older version of cygwin 1.5.7
> was released.  I hope this doesn't cause any problems.  The correct version
> is dated '2004-01-30 19:32'.
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Is this output from uname? I just updated from mirrors.rcn.net and get

1.5.7(0.109/3/2) 2004-01-25 18:44

from 'uname -rv' so it looks like I got the old one(?)

--Rick

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/