Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <200401240045.i0O0joqd006305@guild.plethora.net> From: seebs AT plethora DOT net (Peter Seebach) Reply-To: seebs AT plethora DOT net (Peter Seebach) To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: printf does not print long long ints properly In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:41:30 +0100." <opr1877gqc89ubik@smtp.wp.pl> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:45:50 -0600 X-IsSubscribed: yes In message <opr1877gqc89ubik AT smtp DOT wp DOT pl>, =?iso-8859-2?B?RGFuaWVsIEplbGnxc2tp?= writes: >I am using gcc 3.3.1 >the same code works nicely on linux machine with gcc 3.3.1 >is any other information necessary? What happens if you use %lld, which is what the standard specifies for long long, instead of the L flag, which is for "long double"? -s -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/