Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:26:41 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: prelude to a new cygwin 1.5.7 release: snapshot available Message-ID: <20040123152641.GA11180@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040122230110 DOT 03a05b10 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040122230110.03a05b10@127.0.0.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:04:45PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >At 09:46 PM 1/22/2004, Ton van Overbeek you wrote: >>Any test/strace etc. you want me to run ? >>Or does this rings any bells w.r.t. changes between 1.5.5 and 1.5.6 ? >>There is one change in the 1.5.6 announcement which seems to be related to >>this: >> - Protect tty access from unauthorized users. (Pierre Humblet, >> Christopher Faylor) > >Well, it could be useful for you to track down this change in CVS and >build without it to determine whether this is a contributing factor >or not. Give it a shot. It it would be generally unuseful to point me at a change that I made myself and say "Could that be it?" This is YA case of "Don't even bother". cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/