Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Cygwin-L'" Subject: RE: running the latest cygwin on a windows 2003 server Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:37:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <400EAE3B.5090301@etr-usa.com> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2004 17:37:19.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[3807DAF0:01C3E045] > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Warren Young > Stefan Zachow wrote: > > > > "why is this all happening only to the Windows Server 2003 machine"? > > Because Microsoft tightened down a lot of things in Win2K3 > that previous Windows OSes allowed. > > I upgraded a server from Win2K to Win2K3 a few weeks ago, and > already we've been bit by two of these paranoia changes. I > don't yet have any experience that bears directly on your > problem; this is just a general observation. You might both find some useful information in this article "Development Impacts of Security Changes in Windows Server 2003": http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dncode/html/secure06122003.asp cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/