Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:35:35 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Rafael Kitover cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: HEADSUP: Apache maintainer wanted! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Rafael Kitover wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: cygwin-ownercygwincom [mailto:cygwin-ownercygwincom] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:54 AM > >To: cygwincygwincom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Cc: cygwin-appscygwincom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ahem... > >Subject: HEADSUP: Apache maintainer wanted! > > > >Hi, > > > >The apache package is without maintainer for two weeks now. The former > >maintainer wasn't able to update the apache package and its related > >mod_FOO packages since October, when the last call for update of packages > >were made, which still haven't updated to using OpenSSL 0.9.7 instead > >of 0.9.6. > > > >So, what we need are one or more people who are willing to take over > >maintainership of apache and the mod_FOO packages > > > >WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. > > > >If nobody takes over, the apache and subsequent packages will be > >removed from the Cygwin distribution on 2004-02-03. > > > >Corinna > > Hi Corinna, > > just out of curiosity, in cases of emergency like this, would it be acceptable > if some one or more people volunteered to update, test and upload a package > (and take care of resulting fallout/question) but not to sign up as the > regular maintainer, would that work? Umm, how is this different than signing up as a maintainer and abandoning it later? ;-) Seriously, though, IMO, if you (or someone else) take over a package and announce at some point that you can't keep maintaining it and that the package is up for grabs, that's absolutely fine. What you've outlined above are the duties of the maintainer, and there's nothing that says that you absolutely have to maintain it forever. Life happens, maintainers come and go... In fact, Stipe did a reasonably good job on apache up until very recently... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/