Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Thorsten Kampe Subject: Re: cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:32:56 +0100 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20040120043650 DOT GB22155 AT redhat DOT com> <20040120032822 DOT D2374 AT pervalidus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.10.1de * Frédéric L. W. Meunier (2004-01-20 06:47 +0100) > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not >> a show stopper. > > Yes, but it's something that will make all screen users not > upgrade to 1.5.6 or downgrade to 1.5.5 when they see how broken > it's. Broken dettach / reattach is nothing compared with such a > problem. > > BTW, it's broken in everything (rxvt, XTerm, and cmd.exe). > > I guess it'd be a show stopper if screen were part of Cygwin. > Still, I think it's more important than Vim, as there are a > dozen editors but no screen alternatives. How could you exactly predict what was going to happen on my pc this morning?! :-) Thorsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/