Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:55:17 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: YA snapshot available [Re: new snapshot with some tty/WinMe fixes] Message-ID: <20040117055517.GA11240@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040103181903 DOT GA9424 AT redhat DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103181628 DOT 00835c70 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <20040116183044 DOT GA24127 AT redhat DOT com> <40084421 DOT 23DC049E AT ieee DOT org> <20040116215259 DOT GA26308 AT redhat DOT com> <20040117022135 DOT GA48682835 AT hpn5170x> <20040117034901 DOT GA7899 AT redhat DOT com> <20040117044757 DOT GA49384663 AT hpn5170x> <20040117051629 DOT GB16533 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040117051629.GB16533@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:16:29AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >As always, in the absence of any debugging detail, I can only fix what I >can duplicate myself. After sending my rant, I thought about the fact that you might be routinely using CYGWIN=tty. I tried running a make with that and managed to get some strange behavior. So, I can duplicate this. It was, of course, my old friend vfork. I am seriously considering just ripping out vfork support. I have to do a benchmark to see if there is actually any speed savings for this since I'm adding so many kludges and workarounds to support it that I'm wondering if it is actually slower than normal fork. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/