Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:51:08 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: YA snapshot available [Re: new snapshot with some tty/WinMe fixes]
Message-ID: <20040117045108.GA16533@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20040117022135 DOT GA48682835 AT hpn5170x> <20040103181903 DOT GA9424 AT redhat DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103181628 DOT 00835c70 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <20040116183044 DOT GA24127 AT redhat DOT com> <40084421 DOT 23DC049E AT ieee DOT org> <20040116215259 DOT GA26308 AT redhat DOT com> <20040117022135 DOT GA48682835 AT hpn5170x> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040116231603 DOT 008302f0 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20040116231603.008302f0@incoming.verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:16:03PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 10:49 PM 1/16/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:21:35PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:52:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>>Did my latest cvs checkin fix this?  It seems to for me but I don't
>>>>have time for extensive testing.
>>>
>>>It does, but when I uncomment the setsid() in the program and run from
>>>command.com, sh -c ./a.exe stays in the foreground (no prompt) when
>>>CYGWIN=notty.  Things are OK with CYGWIN=tty.
>>
>>A fix to fhandler_console::close seems to rectify this behavior.
>>Strange that it worked ok on XP.
>
>As I was rebuilding I got JIT gdb to kick in for gcc thread 1 (and then
>make).  It's possible that it's due to something weird in my previous
>build from cvs in my sandbox.  I should really try with a snapshot
>(tomorrow)

Sorry but this stack trace is obvious nonsense.  It's not even worth posting
something this garbled.  Surely you know this.

cgf

>CYGWIN_ME-4.90 hpn5170x 1.5.6(0.108/3/2) 2004-01-16 20:54 i686 unknown
>unknown Cygwin
>
>#0  0xbff66879 in KERNEL32!CallNamedPipeW ()
>#1  0xbff64257 in MultiByteToWideChar ()
>#2  0xbff641cf in MultiByteToWideChar ()
>#3  0xbffbb490 in TlsFree ()
>#4  0xbff7f9fd in KERNEL32!EnumSystemCodePagesA ()
>#5  0xbffbb490 in TlsFree ()
>#6  0x838bccec in ?? ()
>#7  0x61028213 in ret_here ()
>    at ../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/exceptions.cc:406
>#8  0xbff66821 in KERNEL32!CallNamedPipeW ()
>#9  0x0074e8c8 in ?? ()
>#10 0x0074ede0 in ?? ()
>#11 0x0074e8e4 in ?? ()
>#12 0x0074e8a0 in ?? ()
>#13 0x0074ede0 in ?? ()
>#14 0xbff6682d in KERNEL32!CallNamedPipeW ()
>#15 0x0074ede0 in ?? ()
>#16 0x0074e8b0 in ?? ()
>#17 0xbff7845a in KERNEL32!BuildCommDCBA ()
>#18 0x0074e8c8 in ?? ()
>#19 0x0074ede0 in ?? ()
>#20 0x0074e8e4 in ?? ()
>#21 0x0074e8a0 in ?? ()
>#22 0x61027d60 in ZZ17handle_exceptionsE19__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ ()

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/