Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald set sender to blytkerchan AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net using -f
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:29:40 +0100
From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <blytkerchan AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: A month worth of developers time available for cygwin.
Message-ID: <20040115112940.GA29199@linux_rln.harvest>
References: <20040112143903 DOT GC25837 AT linux_rln DOT harvest> <20040112153908 DOT GE8426 AT redhat DOT com> <400335B8 DOT 5040807 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20040113162423 DOT GB27365 AT linux_rln DOT harvest> <4004AFFA DOT 5000500 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0401141133110 DOT 27960 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <400632F2 DOT 4020103 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <400632F2.4020103@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Disclaimer: I had nothing to do with it - I swear!
X-loop: linux_rln.harvest
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I don't have commit access, but I will have the time in four weeks :)
If you've been dutifully archiving the patches, I'll be happy to examine 
them.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if people have in deed been waiting for you
to patch the generic build script: AFAIKnew, it's your script, right?

:)

rlc

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:28:02AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Note that there are a couple of patches to the generic build script
> >floating around in the cygwin-apps archives.  Also, it might pay to look
> >at the sources of a bunch of Cygwin packages that use the generic build
> >script, and compare/extract the good bits/parameterize the differences.
> >I'm sure people (read: package maintainers) will appreciate a new release
> >of the generic build script, and it will also make it easier to eventually
> >switch to an RPM/dpkg-like model.
> 
> Request: can somebody else with commit access please look into this (I 
> have a hunch that folks are waiting for _me_ to do this...)  I've been 
> dutifully archiving the various posted patches but I just can't find any 
> extra time to sift out the wheat from the chaff.  Job/Personal/RealLife 
> is intruding heavily just now...
> 
> --
> Chuck
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

-- 
Traffic jam on the Information Superhighway.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/