Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040104141651.037d0530@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 14:18:01 -0500 To: Beman Dawes , "Gerrit @ cygwin" From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: Bug in fstream code and gcc-2 package? Cc: "John Maddock" In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040104123827.02e10450@mailhost.esva.net> References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20040103203307 DOT 02db8880 AT mailhost DOT esva DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20040103092732 DOT 02db6dd0 AT mailhost DOT esva DOT net> <01e101c3d1f1$9bc8d6a0$29750252 AT fuji> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20040103092732 DOT 02db6dd0 AT mailhost DOT esva DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20040103203307 DOT 02db8880 AT mailhost DOT esva DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20040104123827 DOT 02e10450 AT mailhost DOT esva DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:18 PM 1/4/2004, Beman Dawes you wrote: >OK, the tests are finished. Good news! Eleven additional Boost regression tests now pass and there are no new failures. The only other difference is that the version is being reported as GNU C++ version 3.3.1 (cygming special) rather than just GNU C++ version 3.3.1. I assume that is to be expected. Yes, it's fine and expected. Glad to hear the good results! -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/