Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:41:33 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new snapshot with some tty/WinMe fixes Message-ID: <20040104004133.GA11445@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103181628 DOT 00835c70 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <20040103181903 DOT GA9424 AT redhat DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103181628 DOT 00835c70 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103191807 DOT 00839100 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20040103191807.00839100@incoming.verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 07:18:07PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >>I could be wrong but I don't recall saying that I'd fixed that problem. > >You are right, you said: "I tried all of the test cases that Pierre >previously reported but I'm sure I missed one." So I looked for the >one. Yes, you caught me on semantics. I was trying to convey that I hoped I hadn't broken anything new. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/