Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:59:56 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Unable to compile cygwin
Message-ID: <20031222215956.GB32638@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <BAY9-F16kERMwSuWPjm00018ce5 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BAY9-F16kERMwSuWPjm00018ce5@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:54:43PM +0000, Arash Partow wrote:
>proving a negative is much harder than proving a positive...

Yeah.  You're right.  It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/