Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: Unable to compile cygwin Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:15:34 -0800 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20031222164832 DOT GC2545 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 In-Reply-To: Jim Ramsay wrote: > Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem > running Windows on a 'secure' network. To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy (i.e. if he says it's true, it must be true by definition, because it's a "big company that stands by its products"), while anything Open Source is written by h4x0rs and thus must "prove its trustworthiness". How, you ask them? They don't know, but you'd better "know". No point arguing with them.. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/