Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Jim Ramsay Subject: Re: Unable to compile cygwin Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:10:01 -0600 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <20031222164832 DOT GC2545 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 In-Reply-To: <20031222164832.GC2545@redhat.com> Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:29:25PM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote: > >>I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it. >>But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no >>security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network. > > > Cygwin is not secure. It's a given. There are surely easy local exploits > that could be used to break it. Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem running Windows on a 'secure' network. I'd like to see him try to get the source code and recompile THAT! -- Jim Ramsay -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/