Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:20:25 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New mailing list feature to force Reply-To
Message-ID: <20031216032025.GA32537@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20031216011115 DOT GA30769 AT redhat DOT com> <20031216012531 DOT GA31052 AT redhat DOT com> <20031216031001 DOT GA32207 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031216031001.GA32207@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:10:01PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>If this email makes it to the list without a reply-to, I will continue
>to tweak things.  Please don't take that as an indication that I want
>to enter into a personal dialog about cygwin or reply-tos.

>X-IsSubscribed: yes

And, of course, it didn't have a Reply-To set.  It did have the above header
set, so I guess that's a small victory.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/