Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:39:59 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: install native/x11 ghostscript (setup.exe question) Message-ID: <20031212163959.GG3055@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20031212080443 DOT 4cabd38a DOT alcocer AT helixdigital DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031212080443.4cabd38a.alcocer@helixdigital.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:04:43AM -0800, Dario Alcocer wrote: >On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:41:30 +0100 >(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=) >Ulf-Dietrich Braumann wrote: > >> My question simply is, why setup recommends installing the >> native gs even if the x11 version was already installed, or even >> further, if there is some mechanism to ensure exclusive installation >> of such packages. > >This is a *very* good question; unfortunately my knowledge of >setup.exe's inner workings is very limited. Hopefully someone else >(cgf, Chuck, Nicholas, ?) might be able to answer this one. Actually, this is one from Robert Collins. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/